Suppressing a former Presidential Aide, Sekou Kalasco Damaro, by manipulating legal procedures reveals a deeply troubling pattern of corruption and abuse of power. This case, involving the deliberate obstruction of bond issuance to delay court procedures and keep an accused in jail for longer, justifies the fragility of the rule of law in Liberia and the extent to which powerful political interests can influence judicial outcomes.
At the center of this controversy is Bushuben Kieta, the president's legal advisor, whose alleged actions emphasize the insidious nature of political interference in the judicial process. By reportedly making phone calls to judges and insurance companies to prevent a bond issuance, Kieta appears to have leveraged his position to influence legal proceedings directly. This blatant disregard for the separation of powers and judicial independence is a stark reminder of the challenges facing Liberia's democratic institutions. According to highly placed sources, this is habitual for Kieta, which is counterproductive to our already failing Judicial system and has to stop.
The refusal of SKY Insurance Company to issue the bond, presumably under political pressure, is particularly alarming. Insurance companies have a fiduciary responsibility to honor their commitments unless there are legitimate legal or financial reasons not to do so. In this case, the apparent capitulation to political influence suggests a broader pattern of corruption that extends beyond government institutions and into the private sector, further eroding public trust in both the judicial and financial institutions.
The strategic shifting of the case from Monrovia City Court to Criminal Court A, without proper notice or clear rationale, exemplifies how procedural maneuvers can be exploited to obstruct justice. This tactic, combined with the convenient unavailability of the Judge of Criminal Court A, demonstrates a sophisticated approach to creating delays and frustrating the legal process. Such actions impede the pursuit of justice in individual cases and contribute to a broader culture of impunity.
Targeting a former Presidential Aide through these means raises serious questions about the motivations behind such actions. It suggests a concerted effort to suppress individuals challenging the prevailing political order. This use of legal and administrative mechanisms as tools of political repression is a dangerous trend that threatens the foundations of democratic governance in Liberia.
Moreover, the case reveals the broader implications of political suppression within Liberia's legal and governmental systems. When former government officials or their supporters are subjected to such treatment, it sends a chilling message to others who might consider speaking out against corruption or abuse of power. This climate of fear and intimidation entrenches existing power structures and prevents necessary reforms.
The actions described in this case also resonate with Liberia's urgent need for comprehensive judicial reform. The ease with which political actors appear to manipulate court procedures and influence judicial decisions points to systemic weaknesses in the country's legal framework. Addressing these issues will require legislative changes and a fundamental shift in political culture to respect the independence of the judiciary.
Furthermore, the involvement of a high-ranking legal advisor in these alleged activities underlines the importance of ethical standards and accountability mechanisms for government officials. The apparent abuse of position to influence legal proceedings for political gain represents a serious breach of public trust. It highlights the need for stronger oversight and enforcement of ethical guidelines within the government.
Suppressing the former Presidential Aide by manipulating legal procedures and political interference is a stark reminder of the challenges facing Liberia's democracy. This case serves as a call to action for comprehensive reforms to strengthen judicial independence, enhance transparency in legal proceedings, and establish robust mechanisms to prevent political interference in the judicial process. Through such measures, Liberia can hope to build a truly just and democratic society where the rule of law prevails over political interests.
_____________________________
Get Involved
Do you have additional facts to add to this insight or an opinion you would like to express?
Email Us
References
[5] https://www.insightsliberia.com/post/the-weight-of-justice-liberia-s-supreme-court-faces-a-democracy-defining-momentBushuben Kieta, Secret Hand, influencing Judicial Outcomes
[6] https://analystliberiaonline.com/chaotic-tuesday-police-protesters-clash-several-wounded-arrested-on-capitol-hill/Bushuben Kieta, Secret Hand, influencing Judicial OutcomesBushuben Kieta, Secret Hand, influencing Judicial Outcomes
[7] https://newspublictrust.com/political-interference-has-made-liberia-judiciary-not-independent-says-judge-smithBushuben Kieta, Secret Hand, influencing Judicial Outcomes
Comments